Collect
Fetch canonical work from the sources you already have permission to read.
Coming soon · A kit by Rob Race
A local-first workflow that turns GitHub and Jira history into source-linked evidence you can inspect, correct, and use in a real conversation.
For self reviews, promotion packets, engineering-manager evidence, and consultant client updates.
Generated locally inside your agent session. Nothing to sign into, and no engineering data sent to us.
Review distribution · 8 people
43% of observed participation came from two mapped people.01 / A defensible record
Engineering Evidence preserves the difference between authoring, reviewing, commenting, merging, and assignment. It makes the record useful without pretending activity alone proves impact, effort, or seniority.
Fetch canonical work from the sources you already have permission to read.
Keep source roles, stable IDs, dates, and coverage gaps intact.
Generate a private local dashboard and a source appendix.
Start your review or promotion artifact from the same evidence.
02 / One record, three views
GitHub reviews, pull requests, and Jira transitions.
Authors, reviewers, mergers, assignees, timestamps, and coverage gaps.
dashboard.htmlevidence.jsonself-review.md
02 / Product evidence
This is synthetic data, rendered in the shape of the local artifact the kit produces. The important detail is not the dashboard polish; it is that every row can lead back to a canonical source.
Observed fact
Review participation is visible as review evidence — not rebranded as a productivity score.
Review participation
Counts describe source-observed activity. They do not establish quality, impact, effort, seniority, or productivity.
03 / What you receive
Early access
Early access is for engineers preparing a self review, promotion case, client report, or career conversation. Tell me what you are trying to make visible.
Join the GitHub-first beta